About
What is the Visby Agenda?
The European Union is about to form a new ICT policy agenda replacing the current i2010 vision.
A new plan will be discussed during the Swedish precidency, a consultancy firm (SCF Associates) have been preparing a report identifying the key ICT policy questions. It is supposed to be presented during September, and discussed at a conference in Visby, November 9-10. It is called, the Visby Agenda.
Why this website?
During the last weeks. Several persons have claimed that the draft reports are incoherent and lacks clarity. They claim that anyone could write a better Visby Agenda. Don't just complain. Let's fix it.
On this site we will present our suggestion for a Visby Agenda, and we invite you all to help.
We also think that multiplicity is good. This is the Internet. Even if you don't agree with what we suggest. Write your own Visby Agenda. The more the better. We will link to all suggestions from this page, may the best succeed.
What is the most important ICT policy issues for the European Union? Twitter it (#visbyagenda), Blog it (ping us!), e-mail us (stefan@visbyagenda.se), or leave a comment here.
Who we are
This website is created by a number of people who have ideas about ICT Policy. Some of them works for organisations that have interests in policy, but their contributions to "Our Visby Agenda" does not necessarily represent their employers.
Once the agenda is in place, some of the contributors might sign/support it. Some of them might use the ideas in order to push their own policy agendas.
Right nwo, the editing effort is coordinated by Stefan Görling, Joakim Lundblad, Peter Nõu and Nina Wormbs
Share, Remix, Re-use (Write your own Agenda)
We encurage everyone to publish their opinions, therefore all content on this website licensed under Creative Commons. Use our ideas, combine them with your own, create something new!

September 25th, 2009 - 17:48
Hi Stefan, Joakim, Nina – can you contact me via email or Skype williamheath. See malmo09.org and emalmo09 on Twitter. COuldnt agree more with what youre trying to do here.